
Suggesting changes to cropping systems in the core long-term experiment
The following two tables list current cropping systems and corresponding proposed cropping systems. Except for systems 1-3, all other systems would be modified. Irrigated wheat/fallow systems would be dropped in favor of completely new systems, and the CWT, CCT, LCT, and OCT systems would be expanded to three-year systems with a fourth (horticultural) crop added in the wheat year. Input and ideas about system management, alternative horticultural or other crops and new, non-conforming systems is needed. This input can be provided under the cropping system headings included below.
Table 1. Current Cropping Systems
Cropping System |
Even Years |
Odd Years
|
1. Rain fed wheat control (RWC) |
unfertilized rain fed wheat |
fallow |
2. Rain fed wheat/legume (RWL) |
unfertilized rain fed wheat |
rain fed legume cover crop |
3. Rain fed wheat/fallow (RWF) |
fertilized rain fed wheat |
fallow |
4. Irrigated wheat control (IWC) |
unfertilized irrigated wheat |
fallow |
5. Irrigated wheat/legume (IWL) |
unfertilized irrigated wheat |
rain fed legume cover crop |
6. Irrigated wheat/fallow (IWF) |
fertilized irrigated wheat |
fallow |
7. Conventional wheat/tomato (CWT) |
fertilized irrigated wheat |
fertilized irrigated tomato |
8. Conventional corn/tomato (CCT) |
fertilized irrigated corn |
fertilized irrigated tomato |
9. Legume/corn/tomato (LCT) |
winter legume then irrigated corn |
fertilized irrigated tomato |
10. Organic corn/tomato (OCT) |
winter legume then irrigated corn |
winter legume then irrigated tomato |
There are 6 one-acre plots per system, 3 for each of the two phases. For example, there are also 3 plots in the RWC system that are fallow in even years and planted to wheat in odd years. All tomato/corn systems have been split in half and reduced tillage treatments are now compared to previous tillage treatments within each plot.
Table 2. Proposed Cropping Systems
Cropping system |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
Year 3
|
1. Rain fed wheat control (RWC) |
unfertilized rain fed wheat |
fallow |
repeats and remains the same |
2. Rain fed wheat/legume (RWL) |
unfertilized rain fed wheat |
rain fed legume cover crop |
repeats and remains the same |
3. Rain fed wheat/fallow (RWF) |
fertilized rain fed wheat |
fallow |
repeats and remains the same |
4. Bio-fuels system1 |
irrigated wheat/corn |
irrigated wheat/corn |
irrigated wheat/corn |
5. Alfalfa/corn2 |
irrigated alfalfa |
irrigated alfalfa |
irrigated corn/alfalfa |
6. Irrigated perennial grass or woody crop (e.g. poplars) for cellulosic biomass3 |
irrigated perennial grass or woody perennial |
irrigated perennial grass or woody perennial |
irrigated perennial grass or woody perennial |
7. Conventional wheat/tomato (CWT) |
Plots become part of systems 8 and 9 |
|
|
8. Conventional corn/tomato (CCT) |
fertilized irrigated wheat then horticultural crop4 |
fertilized irrigated tomato |
fertilized irrigated corn |
9. Legume/corn/tomato (LCT) |
winter legume then irrigated wheat then horticultural crop |
winter legume then fertilized irrigated tomato |
fertilized irrigated corn |
10. Organic corn/tomato (OCT) |
winter legume then irrigated wheat with compost and no pesticides then manure then horticultural crop |
winter legume then irrigated tomato with compost and no pesticides |
winter legume then irrigated corn with compost and no pesticides |
1. This new system would attempt to generate the largest amount of grain for ethanol production possible per year, within economic constraints. It will likely emphasize reduced tillage and be managed intensively. This suggestion is subject to elaboration and modification. Oilseeds might be included, or other alternative crops. See (Assessment Planning Process 1-4.pdf) for further discussion.
2. Alfalfa is a major crop in California and in Yolo County. It is important to California’s dairy industry and growing alfalfa has significant effects on soil quality and related farming systems properties associated with sustainability. Plots might be split with half managed similar to commercial hay systems, and the other similar to dairy systems. Corn in rotation would link the crop to the core rotation in systems 7-10.See (Assessment Planning Process 1-4.pdf) for further discussion.
3. Cellulosic biomass for ethanol production can be produced in large amounts. Growing a perennial grass or other cellulose source would have implications for soil quality and other properties associated with sustainability. See (Assessment Planning Process 1-4.pdf) for further discussion.
4. A short season horticultural crop like broccoli or melons would be grown following wheat harvest. Other crops are being considered and can be proposed. See (Assessment Planning Process 1-4.pdf) for further discussion.
5. The plots used for system 7 (CWT), become part of systems 8 and in this proposal.
A list of the ten cropping systems that constitute the core long-term experiment at LTRAS follow. The management of each is described and future plans for the system are included. There is room for comments and suggestions under each system. Some of the systems may be modified after this cropping season. Logically, any change should be an improvement, not simply change for its own sake. Changes should not be so radical that the possibility for inference and interpretation of long-term trends that require making use of the first twelve year’s results is undermined. Currently, for the most intensive management systems (IWF, CWT, CCT, OCT), farming practices are supposed to reflect the best management practices available. Other systems (RWC, RWL, RWF, IWC, IWL, LCT) were included primarily for research purposes to provide a range of irrigation-input treatments, from none to moderately intensive. This range allows for investigation and interpretation of long term trends in soil quality, crop productivity and related phenomena that are central to long-term research and to agricultural sustainabiltiy. This is the core design principle of the long-term experiment that should be taken into account when suggesting new systems to replace the irrigated wheat/fallow series. For example, if an annual, intensive biofuels system were to be added as some have suggested, besides providing information about biofuels production, we need to consider how would it contribute to the core objective of analyzing the effects of inputs and irrigation over time. For more background about the experimental and treatment designs of the LTRAS systems see LTRAS design 2005.pdf.
Changes to current systems:
There is room for comments about each system under the system heading. Plans are to expand the CWT, CCT, LCT, and OCT from two to three year systems by changing them all to C/W/T systems, and to add a horticultural crop following wheat. That crop has yet to be determined. The details of how best to manage each system are open for discussion and suggestions.